Consider Humanism

The American Humanist Association is running its largest ever awareness campaign, and Richard Dawkins is one of the ambassadors. There are videos and some printable ads. Some of the print ads seem more relevant to me, to my immediate social context, than others.

The ones on War and Peace, Intelligence, Fear, Hatred, Genocide, Violence, and Slavery seem to me to have no relevance (I shan’t say ‘no use’) in the Indian context. The rest, though, ring worrisomely true.

We could use an infusion of Humanist views on Punishment in this society. Even Gandhi for example, saw no problem with declaring that natural disasters were punishment for the immorality of the people. Gandhi stuck to that view of the Bengal famine of the 1930s, in the face of criticism from people like Tagore. This is only truer today, and true of many more people, in ways that reveal stupidity, ignorance, and bigotry.

Here’s another: the Supreme Court has decriminalised Homosexuality, but that is a far cry away from this society imbibing Humanist views on homosexuality. With the political Right of India becoming ever more like the rabid fundamentalist Right of the bible-belt in America, the acceptance of homosexuality in society couldn’t happen too soon.

Perhaps what we need even more, and urgently, is for Humanist views on gender-equality to sweep through this society. My views on this, I have made clear in the past. I also hardly need expatiate on this point – I don’t expect many people who are reading this to hold a different view on this matter. No nation or population that relegates half its citizenry to second-class citizenship can ever hope to prosper. I’d even say that no definition of ‘prosperity’ can ignore that half the population is stuck inside four walls with no access to fresh air and sunlight, to say nothing of the arts, literature, music, or science.

Here’s hoping…

[End. Fini. Kaputski. Consider Humanism]


4 thoughts on “Consider Humanism”

  1. Orthogonal …

    “… population that relegates half its citizenry to second-class citizenship …”

    It is “less than half its citizenry” [:)] and i don’t see this term transforming to “half its citizenry”, with female foeticide being rampant in India.

  2. The nameless person makes a smart( aleck) point!

    Female foeticide, if not also infanticide, is still quite prevalent in Haryana and Rajasthan – that I know of. I don’t know what the status of UP or Bihar is. Mayawati is CM in UP; might one hope for some progress?

  3. Just because a lady is CM of some state (capabilities of whom i highly disregard), i dont think there would be a considerable improvement. It’s far from being an inspiration to people that “Girls do achieve”, if she represents that hope. It would be foolish as well to argue that the same lady would not be able to bring considerable change. Oblivion to her efforts in this aspect, whatever she might do/might have been doing may not be adequate enough.

    Female infanticide is a social evil. People has to change/ be changed for that.

    If and when you take up a post on this topic its worth debating.

  4. What the heck was that all about?!

    I happen to know, because I’ve seen census data from 2001, that Haryana has the lowest female-male sex ratio (861-1000) in the country. The second worst, I looked this up, is Punjab(875-1000), not Rajasthan(922-1000). Uttar Pradesh has 898-1000.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s