Of Undertakings and Declarations

I’m sure most people reading this have already got the yearly ‘parent/guardian undertaking’ in their mailbox.i have a few things to say about this.

First off, I don’t think this is an assurance from the students that they will abstain from ragging their juniors so much as it is a tool to bury, minus any legal hassles, students who do get caught in the act of said ragging.

Secondly, I must say that I don’t quite get the point of getting undertakings from the parents of the students. What are the parents expected to do to stop their wards from ragging juniors? Use mind-control? How useless can an undertaking get? What will parents be asked to do next? Give assurances that their children will follow traffic rules? Oh! wait; IITM is already doing that – the ‘no-motor-vehicles’ rule. The inanity!

Come to think of it, what on earth does IITM have to do with parents of its students? Why, for example does IITM require branch-change or dual-degree-transfer forms to be signed by parents of the applicants? How does IITM have any responsibility towards the parents of its students? How are the parents of IITians responsible to IITM?

If IITM isn’t doing this because it is responsible to the parents, how incapacitated does IITM think its students are? Are the ‘best’ students of the country not good enough to decide what branch they should be in? or have the ethics of a chameleon? (although i would probably forgive IITM for the last one)

The best that can be said of this practice is that it is archaic. How I hope we moved out of the nineteenth century…

On Sachin endorsing reynolds stationery

Since when is sachin tendulkar the man to take advice from on academics? Don’t get me wrong, I think the man is a genius… on a cricket field, bat in hand; not in an examination hall with his trusty pen.

Would you ask Stephen Hawking to endorse the latest speedo?